Thursday, April 28, 2005

Don't think twice...It's NOT alright

The House decided to ban pregnant girls from crossing state borders to receive an abortion. This has been done in the past when younger women don't have parental consent for an abortion in the state inwhich they live.
I am not sure how they regulate this law- but in seems to take the pro-choice movement another step back.
Also, a 13 yr/old living in a Florida state shelter was refused the right to an abortion by the Dept. of Children and Families (wouldn't a 13 yr-old mother living in a shelter make for a difficult family situation?)
but, the ACLU is to the rescue- and attepmting to convince the courts of the girl's constitutional rights- mmmmm I wish the court didn't need convincing for that

Let's think twice about electing representatives who make these decisions

Friday, April 22, 2005

Nietzsche's Prayer

Nietzsche saw his life's work as an announcement...incomplete. He was a herald. Anyway, this is a great, and extended, quote by him from the 2nd essay in his On the Geneology of Morals:

"The attainment of this goal would require a different kind of spirit from that likely to appear in this present age: spirits strengthened by war and victory, for whom conquest, adventure, danger, and even pain have become needs; it would require habituation to the keen air of the heights, to winter journeys, to ice and mountains in every sense; it would require even a kind of sublime wickedness, an ultimate, supremely self-confident mischievousness in knowledge that goes with great health; it would require, in brief and alas, precisely this great health!

Is this even possible today?-- But some day, in a stronger age than this decaying, self-doubting present, he must yet come to us, the redeeming man of great love and contempt, the creative spirit whose compelling strength will not let him rest in any aloofness or any beyond, whose isolation is misunderstood by the people as if it were flight from reality-- while it is only his absorption, immersion, penetration into reality, so that, when he one day emerges again into the light, he may bring home the redemption of this reality: its redemption from the curse that the hitherto reigning ideal has laid upon it. This man of the future, who will redeem us not only from the hitherto reigning ideal but also from that which was bound to grow out of it, the great nausea, the will to nothingness, nihilism; this bell-stroke of noon and of the great decision that liberates the will again and restores its goal to the earth and his hope to man; this Antichrist and antinihilist; this victor over God and nothingness-- he must come one day.--"


First of all, this passage is thoroughly soaked in the Nietzschean, and it is therefore in great danger of misunderstanding. There are several words and phrases that evoke pages, even books of his philosophy. A keen eye will also catch several words that inspire entire schools of thought in 20th century Continental philosophy.

Mainly, what I wanted to convey is both the pure artistry and dexterity of the prose, but more importantly the hoping, even pleading thrust of the issue. One can hear Nietzsche begging at the end. Here, Nietzsche is more honest than he often is in the published works. Nietzsche here is not the Nietzsche who later says, "I am no man-- I am dynamite!" This is the "all-too-human" Friedrich Nietzsche...this is the Nietzsche who wrote in a letter:

"My existence is an awful burden-- I would have dispensed with it long ago, were it not for the most illuminating tests and experiments I have been conducting in matters of mind and morality even in my state of suffering and almost absolute renunciation-- the pleasure I take in my thirst for knowledge brings me to heights from which I triumph over all torment and despondency. On the whole, I am happier now than I have ever been in my life."


What is so striking about Nietzsche the artist and the man, as opposed to Nietzsche the philosopher and antichrist, is how he can powerfully juxtapose in the heart of the reader the depths of sadness and despair with the heights of power and hope. This is a philosopher who declared to say "Yes," to be a "Yes-saying" philosopher, but this is a man who cried please from within. I want to say yes to him from the heights, but I sink with him into the please...

The artist, according to Nietzsche, is one who challenges humanity with the immediate and sensual metaphor set against the whole rigid edifice of forgotten metaphors we have come to call "concept," "truth." The artist confuses man so that he no longer knows if he is in waking or dreaming. Has there ever been a philosopher who has so powerfully confounded the spectator like Nietzsche? When I read Nietzsche I tumble with him, I try to keep up with the dialectic, and I feel him laughing at me from beyond the grave...but ultimately, and you may not take me seriously, I forget if I am waking or dreaming. Nietzsche finishes with a denial of the embrace...he inspires anxiety, but the kind of anxiety that produces heightened fear and empowerment...

Friday, April 15, 2005

OOPS what I meant.... TITLE IX

Title IX

Collegiate Women sports in danger of sexism and lower funding levels. The Dept. of Education now requires colleges with womens sports programs showing low levels of participation, and little success, to fill out a survey regarding interest in that sport on the campus. Oh, but mens sports needn't bother with surveys of their programs.
The survey responses are meant to disipher whether or not the particular failing womens sports program should continue to receive the same amount of funding.
I understand that lack of interest in a sports program may entitle more popular programs to more money- BUT the new measure by the Dept. of Education ONLY applies to TITLE IX (created in 1970s to give equal funding to men and womens sports programs) - in other words, mens teams with low interest in success rates are NOT at risk because of the new measure....
WOW- I DON'T UNDERSTAND how theses alterations are filtered through a legislative body without public awareness or acknowledgement of blatant sexism. Even people who mess up blogs by posting a title can see it! :)

The 4th Century

Sunday, April 10, 2005

Cioran

We dislike following, or leading, to its conclusion a depressing train of thought, however unassailable; we resist it just when it affects our entrails, at the point where it becomes malaise, truth and disaster of the flesh. -- No sermon of the Buddha, no page of Schopenhauer fails to turn my stomach...
I think we find here one of the origins of Nietzsche's philosophy of health.

Wednesday, April 06, 2005

Emergency Contraception Bill (EC)

The Governor of Colorado vetoed a bill to require all hospitals to inform rape victims of the EC pill. Bill Owens said his Catholic faith did not influence his descision to veto the bill proposed by rep. Betty Boyd. So if a rape vicim is sent to a public Catholic hospital, I hope she doesn't want to be educated about what options are available for her unfortunate situation. BUT she should be allowed to access whatever medication that would better her situation; regardless of the religious affiliation of her local hospital. Needless to say, I think the separation of church and state is too progressive for many American politicians. (Good thing the US pres. leads the way by demanding that all schools fly their flags at half mast for the POPE)


It seems that a democratic state would support giving all possible information to the public, especially regarding life-changing decisions (as giving birth).

I hope that there will be more bills attempting to ensure ALL types of healthcare options to the public- and that keep religion out of politics
Though this might be a moot point- I feel that free voices often propel politics in a positive direction

Monday, April 04, 2005

Critchley on Derrida

Courtesy of enowning, a nice article by Simon Critchley on Derrida. This passage in particular was interesting:
At the heart of the many of the polemics against Derrida was the frankly weird idea that deconstruction was a form of nihilistic textual free play that threatened to undermine rationality, morality and all that was absolutely fabulous about life in Western liberal democracy. In my view, on the contrary, what was motivating Derrida's practice of reading and thinking was an ethical demand. My claim was that this ethical demand was something that could be traced to the influence of the thought of Emmanuel Levinas and his idea of ethics being based on a relation of infinite responsibility to the other person. Against the know-nothing polemics, deconstruction is an engaged and deeply ethical practice of reading of great social and political relevance.
What Critchley leaves unsaid, of course, is how these readings are ethically relevant, an important question about what it means today to do philosophy. Must our infinite responsibility (is this incurred or accusatory or taken freely?) to the other continually challenge our thought in such a way that every ethical decision is at once a failure?